Dynamic, forward-thinking CPAs • Fixed fees • Fully remote
For finance teams, controllers, and auditors

IAS 1 Comparative Information Restatement

This free, guided checker walks your finance team through the key decision points for IAS 1 Comparative Information Restatement. Answer a few questions to see the likely treatment and the evidence to document.

11 guided steps Private in your browser Official guidance links

Reviewed June 30, 2026Prepared by Financial Connect, CPAs & Consultants

Start the free checker

Your free guided checker

Answer a few quick questions below. It is private - nothing is submitted or stored - and takes about a minute.

This tool is a high-level IFRS screening aid for general information only and is not accounting, audit or legal advice. Conclusions require entity-specific evidence and judgement - confirm the treatment with your advisor.

The questions this tool walks you through

Here is what the checker asks and why each step matters. Prefer to talk it through? Contact us and we will help directly.

Does the change require restatement of comparative financial information?

IAS 8 prior-period errors, voluntary accounting policy changes, and new IFRS retrospective application require restating comparatives as if the new policy or correction had always applied.

Changes in accounting estimates and prospective transition provisions are recognized in current and future periods (IAS 8.36-38); no comparative restatement is required.

Official guidance: IFRS issued standards

Is the change a prior-period error, accounting policy change, or new IFRS standard applied retrospectively?

Each category follows IAS 8 restatement mechanics but differs in disclosure requirements and whether the change is voluntary or mandatory.

Use the interactive tool above to see how this applies to your situation.

Official guidance: IFRS issued standards

Does the restatement materially affect the opening statement of financial position at the beginning of the earliest comparative period?

IAS 1.40A requires a third statement of financial position when retrospective application has a material effect on the opening comparative balance sheet.

Use the interactive tool above to see how this applies to your situation.

Official guidance: IFRS issued standards

Will a third statement of financial position be presented at the beginning of the earliest comparative period?

Present the third statement as at the beginning of the preceding period (IAS 1.40B). IAS 1.40C relieves the entity from repeating the related notes for that opening statement, but the IAS 8.49 correction disclosures and the IAS 1.106(b) equity effects still apply. A common trap is dating the statement at the wrong period end or omitting it when only reclassifications, not remeasurements, are material.

Prepare third statement of financial position per IAS 1.40A when opening comparative effect is material.

Official guidance: IFRS issued standards

Have comparative statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income been restated?

IAS 1.38 requires comparative information for all amounts reported; restated income and OCI must reflect the correction or policy change in each comparative column.

Restate comparative income and OCI before issuing financial statements.

Official guidance: IFRS issued standards

Have comparative statements of cash flows been restated including working-capital reclassifications?

Cash-flow comparatives must align with restated balance sheet classifications; presentation-only reclassifications remap operating lines without changing net cash.

Restate comparative cash flows to align with corrected balance sheet presentation.

Official guidance: IFRS issued standards

Have comparative notes including accounting policies and line-item disclosures been updated?

IAS 1.38 extends to notes; policy descriptions, reconciliations, and narrative comparatives must match restated amounts in the primary statements.

Update all comparative note disclosures to match restated amounts.

Official guidance: IFRS issued standards

Have basic and diluted EPS comparatives been recalculated for restated profit attributable to ordinary shareholders?

IAS 33 requires restated EPS when prior-period errors or retrospective policy changes affect profit attributable to ordinary equity holders.

Recalculate comparative EPS for restated profit amounts.

Official guidance: IFRS issued standards

Have segment and regulatory reporting comparatives been restated where affected?

IFRS 8 segment comparatives and local regulatory formats may require additional restated columns beyond minimum IAS 1 comparative requirements.

Restate segment and regulatory comparatives affected by the correction or policy change.

Official guidance: IFRS issued standards

Is the opening equity reconciliation for the earliest comparative period disclosed?

IAS 1.106(b) requires the statement of changes in equity to present, for each component, the effects of retrospective application or restatement recognized under IAS 8, and IAS 8.49(c) requires the amount of the correction at the beginning of the earliest prior period presented. Reconcile each affected component - retained earnings, OCI reserves, NCI - separately rather than posting a single retained-earnings plug.

Prepare the opening equity reconciliation for each component at the beginning of the earliest comparative period (IAS 1.106(b); IAS 8.49(c)).

Official guidance: IFRS issued standards

Are IAS 8 restatement disclosures including nature and amount of correction complete?

IAS 8.49 requires disclosure of the nature of the error or policy change, amount of correction for each line item and EPS, and earliest-period opening adjustment.

Comparative information is restated with third balance sheet and IAS 8 disclosures complete. Complete IAS 8.49 disclosure before issuing restated financial statements.

Official guidance: IFRS issued standards

Want a professional to confirm your answer?

Send us your situation and one of our senior CPAs will review it with you - fixed fee, no surprises.

Contact Us