The questions this tool walks you through
Here is what the checker asks and why each step matters. Prefer to talk it through? Contact us and we will help directly.
Is this a compensatory stock right - a nonstatutory stock option or stock appreciation right, or an incentive stock option under IRC Section 422 - whose favorable tax treatment depends on setting the grant-date exercise or base price at least equal to the fair market value of the underlying common stock?
The section 409A valuation question arises because a stock option or SAR is exempt only if its exercise or base price is at least the stock's fair market value at grant; setting it too low creates a discounted right that fails 409A. Full-value and cash awards do not carry that exercise-price condition, though they may raise separate 409A or ASC 718 issues.
Analyze the award under its own rules; a common-stock value may still be needed to measure grant-date fair value under ASC 718-10-30.
Official guidance: IRS business tax resources
Is the company's common stock readily tradable on an established securities market?
For readily tradable stock the regulation fixes value by reference to market price and permits a consistent averaging method committed to before the grant. Only privately held stock with no trading market requires the reasonable-valuation analysis and its presumptions; confirm which specific class of stock is being valued.
Determine fair market value from the market price under Treas. Reg. Section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(A) using a consistent, pre-committed method.
Official guidance: IRS business tax resources
Was the fair market value set by a reasonable valuation method, applied reasonably and in good faith, that considers the value of tangible and intangible assets, the present value of anticipated future cash flows, the market value of comparable public and private companies, recent arm's-length transactions in the stock, control premiums or discounts for lack of marketability, and whether the method is used for other purposes?
A reasonable method must weigh the enumerated factors, reflect all information available through the valuation date, and be applied consistently; a value that ignores those factors is not reasonable no matter how it is labeled. This threshold applies even where the company does not claim a safe-harbor presumption.
Treat the grant as exposed under IRC Section 409A and remediate; adopt a reasonable method weighing the regulatory factors.
Official guidance: IRS business tax resources
Which presumption of reasonableness (safe harbor) does the valuation rely on to shift the burden of proof to the IRS?
The three presumptions each shift the burden so the IRS can rebut the value only by showing the method or its application was grossly unreasonable; a reasonable method with no presumption leaves that burden on the company. Selecting a presumption commits you to its specific conditions, which the following steps test.
Test the appraiser's qualifications and the 12-month window. Test each illiquid start-up condition. Confirm the formula would be respected under Treas. Reg. Section 1.83-5 and is used consistently. Document the reasonable method; the burden of proving reasonableness stays with the company.
Official guidance: IRS business tax resources
Was the appraisal performed by a qualified independent appraiser, applying methods that would meet the appraisal standard used for an employee stock ownership plan, as of a date no more than 12 months before the grant date?
The appraisal safe harbor requires genuine independence, appraiser competence meeting the employee stock ownership plan appraisal standard, and a valuation date within 12 months of the grant. A related-party or stale appraisal does not qualify, though the underlying analysis may still support a reasonable method.
The appraisal presumption fails; the value may still be a reasonable method, but without the burden-shifting presumption.
Official guidance: IRS business tax resources
Do all of the illiquid start-up conditions hold - the company has conducted business for less than 10 years, has no class of stock that is publicly traded, reasonably anticipates no change in control or public offering within the regulatory windows (generally 90 and 180 days after the grant), the stock is not subject to certain put or call rights, and the written report was prepared by a person with significant knowledge, experience, or training in performing similar valuations?
The illiquid start-up presumption is narrow: it is unavailable once the company has operated 10 years or more, when a sale or IPO is reasonably anticipated within the specified windows, or when the preparer lacks demonstrable qualifications. A qualifying written report must address the regulatory factors, not merely state a conclusion.
The start-up presumption fails; assess whether a reasonable method or an independent appraisal is a better basis.
Official guidance: IRS business tax resources
How current is the valuation relative to the grant date?
A presumption applies only if the valuation is no more than 12 months old and remains current; a material event arising after the valuation date but before the grant defeats it even inside the 12-month window. Both the elapsed-time limit and the material-event test must be satisfied for the presumption to hold.
The presumption applies; retain the report and calendar the refresh. Refresh the valuation to reflect the event before granting. Obtain a valuation dated within 12 months before granting.
Official guidance: IRS business tax resources