The questions this tool walks you through
Here is what the checker asks and why each step matters. Prefer to talk it through? Contact us and we will help directly.
Does the contract convey the right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration?
Assess whether a contract is or contains a lease at inception. A substitution right is substantive only when the supplier has the practical ability to substitute alternative assets throughout the period of use and would benefit economically from doing so. The common trap is treating capacity portions or supplier-controlled equipment as leases when the customer cannot direct how and for what purpose the asset is used.
The contract is not (and does not contain) a lease; apply other US GAAP such as ASC 606 (ASC 842-10-15-3).
Official guidance: FASB Accounting Standards Codification
Which ownership-transfer feature, if any, does the lease contain?
Reasonably certain is a high threshold assessed at the commencement date, weighing contract-based, asset-based, market-based, and entity-based economic factors such as a bargain purchase price, installed leasehold improvements, or costs of returning the asset. Meeting either ownership criterion makes the lease sales-type for the lessor regardless of the economic-life or present-value tests.
Use the interactive tool above to see how this applies to your situation.
Official guidance: FASB Accounting Standards Codification
Does the lease meet any of the remaining classification criteria: economic life, present value, or no alternative use?
A lessor discounts the lease payments using the rate implicit in the lease. Document the remaining economic life, the fair value support, and the discount rate computation, because these inputs drive both classification and commencement-date measurement. A common trap is omitting lessee residual value guarantees from the present value test or using book value as a proxy for fair value without support.
Use the interactive tool above to see how this applies to your situation.
Official guidance: FASB Accounting Standards Codification
Including residual value guarantees from the lessee and any other third party unrelated to the lessor, does the present value of the lease payments plus those guarantees equal or exceed substantially all of the asset's fair value?
This test differs from ASC 842-10-25-2(d) in one respect: it adds residual value guarantees provided by parties unrelated to the lessor, which is what most often converts a lease that failed the sales-type criteria into a direct financing lease. Obtain the executed guarantee agreements and confirm the guarantors are unrelated to the lessor; guarantees from the lessor's own affiliates do not count toward this condition.
Classify as an operating lease; retain the underlying asset and recognize lease income over the term (ASC 842-10-25-3(b); ASC 842-30-25-10 through 25-11).
Official guidance: FASB Accounting Standards Codification
At the commencement date, is it probable that the lessor will collect the lease payments plus any amount necessary to satisfy a residual value guarantee?
For a sales-type lease, collectibility does not change the classification; it changes the commencement accounting. When collection is probable, the lessor derecognizes the asset and records the net investment and selling profit or loss. When it is not probable, the asset stays on the books and cash received accumulates as a deposit liability until collectibility becomes probable or the contract is terminated or the asset is repossessed. Evaluate credit reports, payment history, and any security arrangements.
Sales-type lease: derecognize the underlying asset and recognize the net investment in the lease and any selling profit or loss at commencement (ASC 842-30-25-1). Do not derecognize the underlying asset; recognize lease payments received, including variable payments, as a deposit liability (ASC 842-30-25-3).
Official guidance: FASB Accounting Standards Codification
For the direct financing test, is it probable that the lessor will collect the lease payments plus any amount necessary to satisfy a residual value guarantee?
Collectibility plays a different role here than in the sales-type model. For direct financing classification, probable collection of the lease payments plus residual value guarantee amounts is a precondition under ASC 842-10-25-3(b)(2); if it is not probable, the lease defaults to operating classification rather than to deposit accounting. Document the credit evaluation of both the lessee and any residual value guarantors.
Classify as a direct financing lease; derecognize the asset and recognize the net investment, deferring any selling profit (ASC 842-10-25-3(b); ASC 842-30-25-8). Both direct financing conditions are not met; classify as an operating lease (ASC 842-10-25-3(b); ASC 842-30-25-10 through 25-11).
Official guidance: FASB Accounting Standards Codification
At the commencement date, how does the fair value of the underlying asset compare with its carrying amount?
Selling profit or loss is the fair value of the underlying asset (or, if lower, the sum of the lease receivable and any prepaid lease payments) less the carrying amount of the asset net of any unguaranteed residual asset, less any deferred initial direct costs of the lessor. The comparison also drives initial direct costs: expense them at commencement when a selling profit or loss exists, defer them into the net investment when fair value equals carrying amount (ASC 842-30-25-1(c)). Initial direct costs are only the incremental costs that would not have been incurred had the lease not been obtained, such as commissions; allocated internal costs do not qualify.
Use the interactive tool above to see how this applies to your situation.
Official guidance: FASB Accounting Standards Codification
Does the lease include variable payments that do not depend on an index or a rate, such as payments based on the asset's usage or output?
ASU 2021-05 addresses leases in which variable payments are excluded from the lease receivable even though the underlying asset would be fully derecognized, which otherwise forced lessors to report a commencement-date loss on economically profitable leases. The override applies only when both conditions hold: the lease would otherwise have been classified as sales-type or direct financing, and the lessor would otherwise have recognized a selling loss at commencement. Payments that vary with an index or a rate, such as CPI-linked rents, do not trigger the override.
Classify as an operating lease under ASC 842-10-25-3A; the day-one selling loss driven by variable payments is not recognized (ASC 842-30-25-10 through 25-11).
Official guidance: FASB Accounting Standards Codification