This free, guided checker walks your finance team through the key decision points for IFRS 9 Financial Guarantee Contracts. Answer a few questions to see the likely treatment and the evidence to document.
Answer a few quick questions below. It is private - nothing is submitted or stored - and takes about a minute.
This tool is a high-level IFRS screening aid for general information only and is not accounting, audit or legal advice. Conclusions require entity-specific evidence and judgement - confirm the treatment with your advisor.
Here is what the checker asks and why each step matters. Prefer to talk it through? Contact us and we will help directly.
Financial guarantee contracts require payment to reimburse the holder for credit loss on a specified debtor instrument when the debtor fails to pay. Issuers that have previously asserted explicitly that they regard such contracts as insurance may irrevocably elect, contract by contract, to apply IFRS 17 instead (IFRS 9.2.1(e)). Credit derivatives that pay out regardless of whether the holder actually incurred a loss on a specified debt instrument are derivatives at FVTPL, not financial guarantees.
Account for the contract as a derivative at FVTPL under IFRS 9 or as an insurance contract under IFRS 17, depending on its trigger and settlement terms (IFRS 9.2.1(e); IFRS 9 Appendix A).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Scope turns on whether the contract compensates the holder for failure of a specified debtor to pay when due per contractual terms. Guarantees of performance obligations, indemnities for tax exposures, and guarantees over equity or residual values do not qualify. Intragroup guarantees issued for no fee still meet the definition and must be recognized by the issuer at fair value, which is a common omission in group reporting.
The arrangement is not a financial guarantee contract under IFRS 9; assess it as a derivative at FVTPL, an insurance contract, or another arrangement per its terms (IFRS 9 Appendix A).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Initial measurement is fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to issuing the guarantee. In a stand-alone arm's length transaction the premium received is normally the best evidence of fair value at inception (IFRS 9.B2.5(a)). For nil-fee or intragroup guarantees, estimate fair value from the borrowing-rate differential the debtor obtains with the guarantee or from a credit-spread model; defaulting to zero is a common misapplication.
Measure the guarantee at fair value at initial recognition, plus directly attributable transaction costs, before finalizing any entries (IFRS 9.5.1.1; B2.5(a)).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
The guarantee liability is measured at the higher of the loss allowance and the unamortized premium per IFRS 9.4.2.1(c). A common misapplication is recognizing both the full unamortized premium and a separate ECL provision, which double counts the exposure; the two amounts are compared, and only the higher is carried. The comparison does not apply when the guarantee is designated at FVTPL or arose from a transfer that failed derecognition (IFRS 9.4.2.1(c)(i)-(ii)).
Remeasure the guarantee liability each reporting period to the higher of the Section 5.5 ECL allowance and the unamortized premium (IFRS 9.4.2.1(c)).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Financial guarantee contracts follow the impairment requirements applicable to the nature of the guarantee. Cash shortfalls for a guarantee are the expected payments to reimburse the holder for the credit loss it incurs, less any amounts the issuer expects to receive from the holder, the debtor, or any other party (IFRS 9.B5.5.32). Discount those shortfalls at a rate that reflects the current market assessment of the time value of money and the risks specific to the cash flows (IFRS 9.B5.5.47).
Develop PD, LGD, and EAD inputs and measure ECL as the expected reimbursement payments to the holder less expected recoveries (IFRS 9.B5.5.32).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Apply SICR criteria to the exposure being guaranteed, including reasonable forward-looking information. For a guarantee, compare the risk of default at the reporting date with the risk when the issuer became party to the irrevocable commitment, which is the date of initial recognition for impairment purposes (IFRS 9.5.5.6). The more-than-30-days-past-due presumption in IFRS 9.5.5.11 is a rebuttable backstop, not the primary indicator, and the assessment uses the change in default risk rather than the change in expected loss amounts.
Use the interactive tool above to see how this applies to your situation.
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Credit impairment indicators include significant financial difficulty, breach, concession, or probable bankruptcy of the debtor. Map the evidence to the credit-impaired definition in IFRS 9 Appendix A and assess the guaranteed exposure itself, not the guarantor's own credit standing. A purchase or origination discount reflecting incurred losses can also indicate impairment; document which indicator was triggered and when, because staging drives both measurement and IFRS 7.35H disclosure.
Recognize lifetime ECL on a credit-impaired (Stage 3) basis, measuring expected reimbursement payments less recoveries from workout and collateral (IFRS 9.5.5.3; B5.5.32). Recognize lifetime ECL (Stage 2) because credit risk has increased significantly without the exposure being credit-impaired (IFRS 9.5.5.3).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
When credit risk has not increased significantly, measure the portion of lifetime ECL associated with defaults in the next twelve months. Twelve-month ECL is not the loss expected on assets that will default in the next 12 months, but the lifetime cash shortfalls weighted by the 12-month probability of default (IFRS 9.B5.5.43). For guarantees, cap the exposure at default at the maximum amount the issuer could be required to pay and credit expected recoveries from the debtor or collateral.
Complete supportable Stage 1 PD, LGD, and EAD inputs so the allowance reflects 12-month default probabilities applied to lifetime shortfalls (IFRS 9.5.5.5; B5.5.43).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Fee income is recognized in profit or loss over the guarantee period unless the guarantee is measured at FVTPL. The unamortized balance also serves as one leg of the higher-of comparison in IFRS 9.4.2.1(c), so it must not be netted against the ECL allowance. Up-front recognition of the whole premium is a common error; the issuer is released from risk over time, so income follows that release pattern under IFRS 15 principles.
Amortize the premium into income over the period the guarantee protection is provided so the unamortized balance feeds the higher-of test (IFRS 9.4.2.1(c)(ii); B2.5(b)).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Overlays must be reasonable, supportable, and consistent with information already embedded in historical rates. Measure ECL as an unbiased, probability-weighted amount determined by evaluating a range of possible outcomes rather than a single best estimate (IFRS 9.5.5.17(a)). Keep a register of post-model adjustments with quantification, rationale, approval, and expected release triggers - unexplained management overlays are a frequent audit and regulator finding.
Support each overlay with scenario weights, quantification, and evidence that it captures risk not already reflected in modeled inputs (IFRS 9.5.5.17(c)).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Disclose credit-risk practices, inputs, assumptions, and reconciliations of the guarantee liability and ECL allowance. Include the maximum amount the entity could be required to pay under issued guarantees as the measure of maximum credit exposure (IFRS 7.B10(c)) and slot that maximum amount into the earliest period in which it could be called in the liquidity maturity analysis (IFRS 7.B11C(c)). Explain significant changes in staging and the drivers of allowance movements period over period (IFRS 7.35H-35I).
Finalize guarantee accounting; the IFRS 7.35A-35N credit-risk disclosures and the liquidity treatment of the maximum guaranteed amount (IFRS 7.B11C(c)) are complete. Complete the outstanding IFRS 7.35A-35N credit-risk disclosures, including the IFRS 7.35H allowance reconciliation, before the statements are issued.
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Send us your situation and one of our senior CPAs will review it with you - fixed fee, no surprises.
Contact Us