The questions this tool walks you through
Here is what the checker asks and why each step matters. Prefer to talk it through? Contact us and we will help directly.
Does the entity hold or issue financial instruments within IFRS 7 scope?
IFRS 7 disclosures apply to all financial instruments recognized under IFRS 9, IAS 32, and related standards including derivatives and loan commitments. Scope also captures unrecognized items such as issued loan commitments (IFRS 7.4) and requires information to be grouped into classes appropriate to the nature of the instruments (IFRS 7.6). Do not overlook trade receivables and payables: even a non-financial entity with only working-capital balances is within scope, though the depth of disclosure scales with materiality.
IFRS 7 financial instrument disclosures are not required because the items are excluded from scope by IFRS 7.3; apply the disclosure regime of the standard that governs each item.
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Have financial assets been grouped by IFRS 9 measurement category for disclosure?
Categories include amortized cost, FVOCI, and FVTPL with separate presentation of assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income. IFRS 7.8 requires the FVTPL population to distinguish mandatorily measured assets from those designated on initial recognition, and equity instruments designated at FVOCI are shown separately from debt at FVOCI (IFRS 7.8(h); 11A). Tie the category totals to the statement of financial position line items so users can reconcile the note to the primary statements (IFRS 7.6).
Complete the mapping of every financial asset to its IFRS 9 measurement category so the IFRS 7.8 carrying-amount tables can be prepared.
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Have financial liabilities been classified between amortized cost and FVTPL categories?
Disclose carrying amounts by category and explain any fair value option or held-for-trading designations for liabilities. Liabilities designated at FVTPL carry extra requirements: the amount of fair value change attributable to own credit risk presented in OCI, the methods used to determine it, and the difference between carrying amount and the contractual amount payable at maturity (IFRS 7.10-11). A common gap is failing to separate trading derivatives from designated liabilities inside the FVTPL total.
Map every financial liability to the IFRS 7.8(e) or (g) category and flag fair-value-option designations that trigger the IFRS 7.10-11 own-credit disclosures.
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Has reconciliation from opening to closing balances been prepared for each category?
Reconcile carrying amounts showing additions, disposals, fair value changes, transfers, and impairment movements where material. IFRS 7.35H requires the loss allowance reconciliation by ECL stage, and IFRS 7.35I requires an explanation of how significant changes in gross carrying amounts contributed to allowance movements - the two schedules must articulate. Build the reconciliations from subledger activity rather than plugging the difference; unexplained plugs are a recurring review finding.
Prepare the opening-to-closing reconciliations - loss allowance by stage (IFRS 7.35H), related changes in gross carrying amounts (IFRS 7.35I), and Level 3 rollforwards (IFRS 13.93(e)) - before disclosure sign-off.
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Does the entity have material credit risk exposure on financial assets?
Credit risk disclosures apply to debt instruments, loan commitments, financial guarantee contracts, and contract assets under IFRS 15. IFRS 7.31-34 requires qualitative and quantitative information about each risk arising from financial instruments based on what is reported internally to key management personnel, and IFRS 7.35A scales the credit disclosures to the extent of exposure. Include the maximum exposure to credit risk where collateral is not reflected, using the measures in IFRS 7.B10 - for guarantees, the maximum amount payable.
Use the interactive tool above to see how this applies to your situation.
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Has credit quality and ECL methodology been disclosed by impairment stage or internal rating?
Disclose gross carrying amounts by credit risk rating or past-due status, ECL movements between stages, and methods including forward-looking macroeconomic scenarios where applied. IFRS 7.35F covers how SICR and default are determined and how forward-looking information is incorporated; IFRS 7.35M requires exposure by rating grade separately for 12-month ECL, lifetime ECL, and credit-impaired populations, with the simplified-approach option of a provision matrix for trade receivables (IFRS 7.35N). Ensure the narrative matches the model actually run - mismatches between the stated and applied SICR criteria are a common finding.
Complete the credit risk package: management practices (IFRS 7.35F), ECL inputs and assumptions (IFRS 7.35G), the allowance reconciliation (IFRS 7.35H), and exposure by rating grade (IFRS 7.35M).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Does the entity face material liquidity risk from financial liabilities or off-balance sheet items?
Liquidity risk is the risk an entity will encounter difficulty meeting obligations from financial liabilities including derivative settlement and loan commitments. Base the assessment on the quantitative data provided internally to key management personnel (IFRS 7.34(a)) and remember off-balance sheet sources: issued financial guarantees enter the maturity analysis at the maximum guaranteed amount in the earliest period callable (IFRS 7.B11C(c)). Concentrations of funding sources or maturity dates are themselves disclosable (IFRS 7.34(c); B8).
Use the interactive tool above to see how this applies to your situation.
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Has a contractual maturity analysis for remaining contractual periods been prepared?
Maturity tables show undiscounted cash flows by time band including interest and derivative gross settled flows where material. Because amounts are undiscounted, the table will exceed balance sheet carrying amounts - do not force it to tie; instead reconcile the difference in the drafting file (IFRS 7.B11D). When the counterparty can demand repayment, amounts go into the earliest band in which payment can be required, including demand deposits and callable guarantees (IFRS 7.B11C).
Prepare the contractual maturity analysis on a gross undiscounted basis, including interest and gross-settled derivative flows, before disclosure completion (IFRS 7.39(a)-(b); B11D).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Have liquidity management policies and concentration sources been described?
Explain how liquidity risk is managed including funding sources, committed facilities, and concentration of maturity dates. IFRS 7.B11F suggests covering committed borrowing facilities, holdings of assets readily saleable or eligible as central-bank collateral, diversified funding sources, and internal limit structures. Concentrations deserve specific attention when a single lender, market, or currency dominates the maturity profile (IFRS 7.34(c)); boilerplate that ignores the entity's actual treasury practice fails the disclosure objective.
Draft the IFRS 7.39(c) narrative describing how liquidity risk is managed, covering committed facilities, liquid asset buffers, and concentration of funding and maturity dates (IFRS 7.B11F).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Are any financial instruments measured at fair value in the balance sheet?
Fair value disclosures apply to all fair-valued instruments including FVTPL, FVOCI, and investment property debt instruments with fair value note cross-reference. Even for amortized-cost instruments, IFRS 7.25 requires fair value to be disclosed by class in a way that permits comparison with carrying amounts, unless carrying amount reasonably approximates fair value for short-term items (IFRS 7.29(a)). Disclosed-but-not-recognized fair values still need hierarchy categorization under IFRS 13.97.
Use the interactive tool above to see how this applies to your situation.
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Has each fair value been classified into the Level 1, 2, or 3 hierarchy?
Level 1 uses quoted prices in active markets; Level 2 uses observable inputs; Level 3 uses significant unobservable inputs. The level of the entire measurement is driven by the lowest-level input that is significant to it (IFRS 13.73), so an observable-price instrument with a significant unobservable adjustment is Level 3, not Level 2. Document and apply a consistent policy for the timing of transfers between levels and disclose transfers between Levels 1 and 2 (IFRS 13.93(c); 95).
Assign a hierarchy level to each fair value based on the lowest-level significant input, and set a consistent transfer policy, before publishing the note (IFRS 13.72-75; 93(b); 95).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Have Level 3 fair value reconciliations and sensitivity disclosures been prepared where material?
Level 3 instruments require rollforward of fair value, gains and losses, purchases, and transfers plus sensitivity to unobservable inputs when material. The reconciliation separately identifies unrealized gains and losses on instruments still held at period end (IFRS 13.93(f)) and describes the valuation processes applied (IFRS 13.93(g)). For financial instruments, quantify the effect of changing unobservable inputs to reasonably possible alternatives where that would change fair value significantly (IFRS 13.93(h)(ii)).
Publish the complete financial instrument note: categories (IFRS 7.8), credit risk (IFRS 7.35A-35N), liquidity (IFRS 7.39), and the fair value hierarchy with Level 3 detail (IFRS 13.93). Complete the Level 3 opening-to-closing reconciliation and the unobservable-input sensitivity analysis before the note is finalized (IFRS 13.93(e), (h)).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards