This free, guided checker walks your finance team through the key decision points for IFRS 9 Simplified ECL for Trade Receivables. Answer a few questions to see the likely treatment and the evidence to document.
Answer a few quick questions below. It is private - nothing is submitted or stored - and takes about a minute.
This tool is a high-level IFRS screening aid for general information only and is not accounting, audit or legal advice. Conclusions require entity-specific evidence and judgement - confirm the treatment with your advisor.
Here is what the checker asks and why each step matters. Prefer to talk it through? Contact us and we will help directly.
The simplified approach measures the loss allowance at lifetime expected credit losses. It is mandatory for trade receivables and IFRS 15 contract assets that do not contain a significant financing component (IFRS 9.5.5.15(a)(i)), and it is a policy choice for those that do and for lease receivables (IFRS 9.5.5.15(a)(ii), (b)). Confirm the population first: loans, intercompany balances, and debt investments stay in the general model.
These receivables fall outside the simplified approach; measure ECL under the general model with staging (IFRS 9.5.5.3).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Under the simplified approach the allowance is always measured at lifetime ECL, so the entity does not track significant increases in credit risk or run the 12-month and lifetime staging of the general model (IFRS 9.5.5.15). For trade receivables and contract assets without a financing component it is mandatory rather than a free election; the choice only exists where the standard permits it. The trap is defaulting these balances into the general model.
Without the simplified approach, apply the general impairment model with 12-month and lifetime staging (IFRS 9.5.5.3, IFRS 9.5.5.5).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Group receivables that share credit-risk characteristics before applying loss rates, for example by product, customer type, geography, collateral, or past-due status (IFRS 9.B5.5.5, IFRS 9.B5.5.35). Sufficiently granular grouping is what makes a provision matrix reasonable and supportable. The common misapplication is pooling dissimilar customers, which masks the risk profile of individual segments.
Group receivables by shared credit-risk characteristics before applying the provision matrix (IFRS 9.B5.5.5).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Build the provision matrix from historical credit-loss experience by ageing band, derived from write-off and recovery data over a period representative of the current portfolio (IFRS 9.B5.5.35). Each ageing bucket carries a loss rate applied to the gross carrying amount in that bucket. A too-short or non-representative observation window is a common weakness that understates the allowance.
Build historical loss rates by ageing band to form the provision matrix (IFRS 9.B5.5.35).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Adjust the historical loss rates for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions, using information available without undue cost or effort (IFRS 9.5.5.17(c), IFRS 9.B5.5.52). Link the overlay to observable drivers such as unemployment or sector stress and document the basis. The trap is double-counting - reflecting the same macroeconomic deterioration both in the historical rate and again in the overlay.
Adjust historical loss rates for reasonable and supportable forward-looking information (IFRS 9.5.5.17).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Compare the loss rates the matrix predicts against the actual write-offs and recoveries in recent periods, and investigate any divergence (IFRS 9.B5.5.52). Back-testing is the evidence that the historical rates and forward-looking overlays still produce a reasonable lifetime ECL. Failing to update the methodology when actual losses drift away from predictions leaves a stale, unsupportable matrix.
Back-test the provision matrix against recent write-offs before finalising the allowance (IFRS 9.B5.5.35).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Assess individually significant or credit-impaired receivables separately, because a collective matrix can dilute the risk on a single large or defaulted account (IFRS 9.5.5.4, IFRS 9.B5.5.1). Identify balances with objective evidence of impairment - major disputes, customer insolvency, or prolonged default - and measure their lifetime ECL directly. The trap is burying a known-bad account inside an otherwise performing pool.
Use the interactive tool above to see how this applies to your situation.
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Tie the matrix output to the accounting records: reconcile the gross carrying amount, the loss allowance, and write-offs to the AR subledger and the general ledger, and roll the allowance forward for the period (IFRS 7.35H). This reconciliation is what supports the loss allowance disclosure. Unreconciled write-offs or recoveries are a frequent source of an allowance that does not agree to the ledger.
Reconcile the lifetime allowance to the general ledger and subledger before posting (IFRS 7.35H).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
IFRS 7 requires disclosure of concentrations of credit risk when not apparent from other disclosures (IFRS 7.34(c)), together with the entity credit-risk exposure by grade or customer group (IFRS 7.35K). Identify concentrations by customer, sector, or geography and describe how they are managed.
Prepare the credit-risk concentration disclosures (IFRS 7.34(c), IFRS 7.35K).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Document a policy to review the methodology and assumptions regularly - at least annually - and to refresh the historical loss rates and forward-looking overlays (IFRS 9.B5.5.52). A fixed schedule keeps the matrix reasonable as the portfolio and economic outlook change. Loss rates left unchanged through a downturn are a common cause of an understated allowance.
Schedule at least an annual refresh of historical loss rates and overlay assumptions (IFRS 9.B5.5.35).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Complete the IFRS 7 credit-risk disclosures: the credit-risk management practices and use of the simplified approach (IFRS 7.35F), the inputs, assumptions, and estimation techniques behind the estimate including the provision matrix (IFRS 7.35G), the reconciliation of the loss allowance (IFRS 7.35H), and the credit-risk exposure and concentrations by grade, customer, or sector (IFRS 7.35K). The common gap is presenting the allowance without the concentration and reconciliation disclosures.
Simplified approach lifetime ECL and the IFRS 7 credit-risk disclosures are complete (IFRS 7.35F, IFRS 7.35H). Complete the remaining IFRS 7 credit-risk disclosures (IFRS 7.35F, IFRS 7.35K).
Official guidance: IFRS issued standards
Send us your situation and one of our senior CPAs will review it with you - fixed fee, no surprises.
Contact Us